• email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Court hunting decision "sets clear precedent" for subsequent years - Dimas

EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas said today that although the decision by the European Court to ban spring hunting in Malta applied only for this year, "we consider that it sets a clear precedent in relation to spring hunting in subsequent years also in other Member States.

Mr Dimas said the court's decision "emphasises the importance of protecting the common natural heritage of the EU in preventing the hunting of birds during this period."

Earlier today the Maltese government onfirmedthat spring hunting for quail and turtle dove will not be allowed this spring.

It was its only reaction to the European Court of Justice decision.

BirdLife International and BirdLife Malta in a statement today further to the one issued yesterday, welcomed the decision by the European Court of Justice to issue interim measures ordering Malta not to open the 2008 spring hunting season for Turtle Dove Streptopelia Turtur and Quail Coturnix coturnix.

"This Order implies that the Court sees urgent need to prevent irreversible damage to these migratory bird species, while a final ruling on this case is pending and not expected before 2009." BirdLife said.

"The Court stressed in paragraph 48 of its Order the importance of protecting the EU's common heritage and stated that "the interest of hunters does not appear to have a value superior thereto".

Konstantin Kreiser, EU Policy Manager at BirdLife International welcomed the decision of the Court: "Although we regret it had to come this far - and Europe-wide embarrassment has been caused for Malta, we are confident that now government-authorised spring hunting has become a thing of the past in Malta. At the same time we hope that the Maltese government, police and all stakeholders will work together to clamp down on the still widely spread illegal hunting and trapping in the country."

The court case was instituted by the European Commission In January 2008, based on a complaint by BirdLife.

Joseph Mangion, President of BirdLife Malta commented: "We are pleased to see that the court has acknowledged the importance of protecting the common natural heritage of the European Union and its member states as overriding the individual interests of the Maltese hunters, who have the opportunity nonetheless to hunt these same birds in autumn. Malta has a special responsibility as it is the southernmost central Mediterranean country through which migratory birds first pass on their way to their European breeding grounds, and we should be setting an example rather than seeking exceptions."

Picture: Turtle Dove, by Denis Cachia.

(See full text of Court decision in separate story)

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

Ernest Vella (on 16/5/08)
Dear Lisa Schembri, maybe hunting will be banned year after year but I assure that no bird watcher will be allowed to enter my property and stay in peace under a carrob tree I own. I am reporting every intruder to the police and will be arraigned to court for laws are equal to everyone
Lisa Schembri (on 9/5/08)
First off i'm glad hunting has been banned,hopefully it will continue to be banned year after year.

Maybe hunters will find something more productive and less violent to teach their children or enjoy during free time...like pottery or knitting.
J Pace (on 27/4/08)
Andrew Gatt so you think that BirdLife is causing Europe-wide embarrassment?! I think many of you are self-righteously trying to clutch at straws to blame everyone else - BirdLife, the government etc except the actual guilty party i.e. the many many hunters who incessantly ignore and try to ridicule everyone else by breaking the law!!

Let me give you one small example of who is causing embarrassment and giving Malta a bad name: A friend of mine is involved in the tourist industry and last spring he was called out to a farmhouse that was occupied by 2 British families who were spending their holiday there. First they were continuously bothered at every hour, starting at 5am, by hunting shots. Then the cherry on the cake was when they were swimming in the pool and a kestrel (a protected bird of prey) dropped dead in the water next to them!! They were obviously appalled by the scene and left the place abruptly there and then! They were so disgusted by this that they promised never to return and to actually spread the word to anyone who showed any inkling of visiting Malta! So tell me, who is giving Malta a bad name?
R.Spagnol (on 27/4/08)
At last Mr.Dimas has admitted that there exists spring hunting in other member states. I don't accept how he mentions a"precedent" for other countries when their case is already decided in favour of hunting in spring!!

Other member states have proper politicians who stand up for facts and truly represent their population with their traditions.
Richard Cachia Zammit (on 27/4/08)
Quoting yourself Sylvana "THE MALTESE LAW-ABIDING HUNTERS DEMAND AN EXPLANATION FROM THE ABOVE RESPECTABLE INDIVIDUALS. All other comments from persons who are enjoying inflicting mental violence on the thousands of Maltese Hunters are superfluous!" - I assume that those who are enjoying inflicting etc etc are the anti-hunting lobby, so how come NOW you're so SURPRISED that you didn't get a reply from them? Anyway, after all, the anti-hunting lobby never promised anything to hunters, so that's not their problem. Oh and by-the-way, this morning I heard shooting and this is inflicting mental violence on the public in general, including law abiding hunters, knowing that they are obeying the law whilst out there there are many who haven't got the least consideration to anything or anyone and just continue breaking the law. As long as these MANY irresponsible shooters are around, hunting in Malta will continue to get a bad name.
JOHN SCERRI (on 26/4/08)
M Borg : You imagined I was commenting on the turtle dove or whatever it is.
I never mentioned it .
Read my comment again please.
I was talking about RIFLE SHOTS - HUNTING SOUNDS - SHOOTING SOUNDS - 'Hsejjes ta SPARAR BIS-SENTER' with the season closed. Do you understand now .
'
You don't no need to be illmannered with everyone just to make your point .

Before writing your comments look outside ,listen to the birds, count to ten and think.
Sylvana Zarb Darmanin (on 26/4/08)
SURPRISE! SURPRISE!

No replies to my comments appearing below. But then I quoted FACTS and these do not appear to interest the anti-hunting lobby, or those involved, for that matter!

Anyway, we are used to surprises now: The hunters being promised that Spring Hunting will continue and this does not materialise; Being informed of the ECJ decision by BirdLife when the Government confirmed that it had not as yet received any communication; Reading comments mentioning that the Maltese Hunters use RIFLES to go hunting; etc. etc.

THE MAJORITY OF READERS WOULD RATHER READ ABOUT FACTS AND CLARIFICATIONS ARE AWAITED.
Richard Cachia Zammit (on 26/4/08)
Andrew Gatt, wake up, it's all your fault and that of the FKNK. Birdlife is doing its job to stop illegal hunting and that's what you and your federation should have been doing as well all these years. I have been stressing over and over again. The real enemy of law abiding hunters is not Birdlife but those irresponsible hunters who unfortunately are much more than FKNK wants us to think. FKNK was never able to control these people and chose to ignore them and deny their existence, even though illegal hunting is so rampant and evident in our islands and because of this the FKNK lost its credibility. By just saying that you are against illegal hunting is not enough, you have to show that you really mean it. Take for example last year. Hunters had the chance to show that they are responsible people. They knew that the future of spring hunting was not so clear and yet, many forgot everything once a good passage of Honey Buzzards occurred, and as always a massacre followed, so much so that the hunting season had to be cut short. Malta is now a member state of the EU and as long as those many irresponsible hunters continue to roam our countryside, the future of hunting in Malta is bleak.
Franco Farrugia (on 26/4/08)
What are we saying here?
Shall we say we should have never become members of the EU for the sake of hunting and trapping? Is that what we are saying? To forfeit everything under the sun for the sake of a pastime? A pastime which many Maltese citizens don't want, after all, because it is one which tramples on the rights of others!
What 'ingrained values' are we talking about, here? What have 'values' got to do with hunting and trapping? And what 'values' do we uphold? Those that come from our inherent willingness to be double-faced? What in Maltese is called 'oqbra imbajda'? For crying out loud!!! Have a life!
Tony Caruana (on 26/4/08)
Raymond Sammut

Do not worry about my credibility ! We all should be worried about the credibility of our leaders. Including our President who twice wrote to us assuring us of spring hunting.
Andrew Gatt (on 26/4/08)
"Although we regret it had to come this far - and Europe-wide embarrassment has been caused for Malta, we are confident that now government-authorised spring hunting has become a thing of the past in Malta"

Well, Konstantin! Any Europe-wide embarrassment was caused by YOUR organization, Birdlife International, that kicked off this court case like classroom sneaks running to teacher with sob stories and misrepresentations. Instead of working to control illegal poaching by other means, you have simply destroyed the pastime of thousands of Maltese citizens. Locally, Birdlife have agitated against spring hunting by manipulating public opinion with false facts and figures, carefully posed photos and utter rubbish about breeding, behavioural and migration patterns. They even expect us to believe Malta will be overflowing with tourist birdwatchers, when it is countries like Israel (which is REALLY on a main migration route!) with 500 MILLION birds annually, that attract.

We have ALL been labelled as butchers and lawbreakers when the current reality is that most of us who obey the laws are at home while poachers are......guess what..........still poaching! I have never shot a protected bird in my life. I have never hunted out of season. I have never left shot birds behind. All my bag is for the table. Yet the faceless bureaucracy you know your way around so well has seen fit to accept your request for interim measures. Guilty before even being heard, let alone before being proven innocent.

And as to the EU in general, if only it made the same effort to control and curb the REAL Spring Migration that we get in Malta - that of thousands of illegals ending up on our shores, in detention camps, in our streets, costing us time, resources and negative publicity. Ugh what hypocrisy. The lives of a few game birds in Spring have higher value in the EU than those of human beings in a desperate situation, clinging to some tuna pen while EU countries point fingers at each other in a bid to evade responsiility.



Edward Camilleri (on 26/4/08)
Well done Mr. Dimas and Birdlife Malta/International! This is a milestone in bird protection.

Whatever the critics say, they cannot be trusted, because their only interest is how many dead birds they can amass in their showcase. How can one appreciate a dead bird over a living one is beyond human reasoning.

M. Borg (on 26/4/08)

@ JOHN SCHERRI.
You don't really know what you are saying!! Maybe you are trying to take us and the public for "another ride". Rifle Shots??! Do you have the impression that one can shoot a turtle dove using a RIFLE??!?? Ahna ahna jew m'ahniex????

M. Borg (on 26/4/08)
What a FREE country?!!
You can BUY DRUGS FROM WHEREVER YOU WANT;
YOU CAN GO WITH AS MANY PROSTITUTES YOU WANT;
YOU MAY SWEAR ;
YOU MAY STEAL THE COUNTRY AND THE CITIZENS BY CLAIMING SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS THE WAY YOU WANT;
YOU CAN 'TEASE' HUNTERS BUT THEY CAN'T 'REPLY';
YOU CAN DO WHATEVER YOU WANT SINCE THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY;

BUT YOU CAN'T HUNT......... THIS IS THE ONLY ILLEGAL ARGUMENT AT THE MOMENT.



joseph lia (on 26/4/08)
PATHETIC, biased and totally unfair!
You, (Mr. Dimas) know all the facts, irreversable damage!, please who is being dramatic now?
Yes indeed, you, sir are sending a very clear message to the other member states.......MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY!
PATHETIC
Joseph Lia
even-more-eurosceptic
Gianluca Barbieri (on 25/4/08)
@ Angelo Gatt.. i can't believe that you are mixing up the EU and the Council of Europe, which are 2 different bodies.. We've been members of the Council since 1965.. they are in favour of abortion.. not EU!...

As regards to spring hunting.. well done to the EU for issuing this decision.. which the Maltese government of the past and present were afraid to issue because they would lose votes.. Hunting and trapping birds is not a sport, its destroying the environment and depriving other people from having the liberty of seeing these birds alive.. Once again Well done EU
Raymond Sammut (on 25/4/08)
That's very unethical, Mr. Caruana. When a personal message is sent to you in good faith, you do not go and broadcast it to the whole world. I draw my own conclusion? Sure. You have just thrown your own credibility out the door.
Alfred Azzopardi (on 25/4/08)
I rarely agree with victor battistino but he surely has a point this time.
A bugeja (on 25/4/08)
This is exactly why many people voted for the EU - so that decisions our government is too weak to take will be forced on him by the EU. Any hunter who believed the derogation is a fool. It was obviously a very temporary measure of convenience.
MARK MIFSUD BONNICI (on 25/4/08)
THE EU COMPARED MALTA'S HUNTING CASE TO THAT OF FINLAND. HERE TOO AS IN MALTA THE FINISH GOVERNMENT PROMISED SPRING HUNTING AFTER EU MEMBERSHIP. HERE TO AN INJUSTICE WAS DONE SINCE THE LONG TAILED DUCK SATISFIED THE CRITERIA OF "NO SATISFACTORY SOLUTION" AND STILL THE ECJ RULED OUT SPRING HUNTING.

MALTA WILL ALSO BE BASING ITS CASE ON "NO SATISFACTORY SOLUTION" FOR HUNTING TURTLE DOVE AND QUAIL IN AUTUMN. AS IN THE FINNISH CASE MALTA HAS A JUSTIFIED REASON. HOWEVER WILL JUSTICE PREVAIL?

THE INTERIM MEASURES CHARADE HAS SHOWN THAT JUSTICE WITHIN THE EU IS MORE A MATTER OF CONVENIENCE THAN A RIGHT.
Adrian Allain (on 25/4/08)
What a beautiful picture of a turtle dove 'shot' by Denis Cachia.

Now that truly is a skill that we can all admire.
keith abela (on 25/4/08)
what does abortion have to do with hunting ? that is a very weak and immature arguement .. get your facts right .
tony caruana (on 25/4/08)
This is an email reply by our Prime Minister to me on the 27/09/07
Make your own conclusions !

Ircevejt l-email tieghek.

Jiddispjacini li ghalik il-kacca tigi qabel il-hajja ix-xoghol u l-gid. Nahseb li qieghed taghmel zball kbir kemm ghalik kif ukoll ghal familja tieghek. Imma din haga tieghek u jiena nista biss nipprova nipperswadik li qieghed taghmel zball.

Dwar il-kacca, ilhom jghidulkom minn qabel ma dhalna fl-Unjoni Ewropeja li l-kacca u l-nsib ser jispiccaw. Ghaddew erba snin u inti u shabek ghadkom qieghdin tikkaccjaw u tonsbu. Nixtieq nifhem min dahak b'min.

Ghidli inti. Illum l-istagun miftuh jew le ?

Fit-tlett snin li ghaddew l-istagun infetah jew le ?

Nerga nistaqsik - min dahak b'min.

Inselli ghalik,

L. Gonzi


For the benefir of non Maltese readers Mr Gonzi asks me
" Who is fooling who ?"
Matthew Azzopardi (on 25/4/08)
Mr. Paul A Camilleri is very funny. Or at least i hope he thinks so. G Let's pray that this is a precedent that will continue for ever. Birds are there to fly and live, not ending up as a prize of some hunter.
Angelo Gatt (on 25/4/08)
E.U.= YES FOR ABORTION AND NO TO SPRING HUNTING. SHAME,SHAME.SHAME.
S Micallef (on 25/4/08)
@ Adrian Cardona

I definitely agree with you 101%. i, having voted No for the Eu... in a fresh referendum will definitely vote YES.

Thumbs up again.
Raymond Sammut (on 25/4/08)
If what Paul A. Camilleri is saying were to materialise, that may help genuine Maltese hunters only in the short term. As a small group of indigenous men exercising their basic human right, they must ultimately have International Law on their side. If Malta is inside the EU, then they will deal with the EU. If outside, then they will deal with the Maltese government. Whether Malta is an EU member or not should be irrelevant to them. The BirdLife lobby are clearly a very sharp group of individuals. They have impressively outclassed the FKNK. Assuming that you can be categorised as a genuine hunter, Mr Camilleri, you are going to have to think far beyond the EU if you are going to succeed in your goal.
carmen pisani (on 25/4/08)
Well now we all know that us Maltese, once a proud country with its own beliefs now has to take what ever the dictatorship of the (in)famous E.U has to offer. Maybe one day in the not too distant future they will ban Spring hunting in the U.K, Bull Fighting in Spain, eating of Finches in Cyprus, boiling of lobsters alive in all of Europe, boiling alive the common snail,motorists overtaking on the inside lane,motorists jumping red lights,motorists talking on mobiles whilst driving..the list will never end...oh and realizing that the President of Malta's words,actions,speeches and letters in black and white mean absolutely nothing to their own people. Good bye Malta Welcome European busy bodies!!!!!
Adrian Cardona (on 25/4/08)
@Paul A. Camilleri
yeah, right....Malta will be pulled out of the EU by its hair, a fresh referendum will be called and with BOTH PN and MLP now in favour of the EU, the result would be 99% yes and hunting would be abolished forever...oh for such a day!
Ray Bajada (on 25/4/08)
I guess that from now on; whenever the EU intends to start a crusade against one of the larger member states; it will first start in Malta. According to Dimas words "we consider that it sets a clear precedent in relation to spring hunting in subsequent years also in other Member States" . This really implies that what the EU did not manage to implement against larger member states since its existence; it has exercised it against Malta within 5 years since membership and now shall use our poor little country to set the example, but you wait and see, what has been happening in larger EU Member States (which is thousands of times worse than Malta) shall not stop.
Paul A. Camilleri (on 25/4/08)
Just found out , that what I have been saying all this time is being checked out by Professional Lawyers. BECAUSE ALOT OF UNTRUTH WAS USED BEFORE THE REFERENDUM TO LURE IN MANY PEOPLE INTO VOTING YES, THERE IS A VERY GOOD CHANCE THAT MALTA'S YES VOTE WILL BE NULLED AND THAT A FRESH REFERNDUM WILL HAVE TO BE CALLED. That's trouble for you eh?
victor battistino (on 25/4/08)
Respecting all.........I only hope that the EU can work so feverishly towards another imMigration problem Malta is facing ....... maybe anyone cares about the other embarrasement Malta is facing with having to look after fellow humans who are just dumped on our shores !
JOHN SCERRI (on 25/4/08)

This very morning around 0730hrs sounds similar to rifle shots were heard around areas of Hal Far.

Rifle shots were also said to have been heard this week in areas around Rabat.

Has FKNK + POLICE got anything to say about this ?
Have the police arrested anyone during the past week or two for hunting when the season was closed ?

Raymond Sammut (on 25/4/08)
This is only a small start. The real issue here is that the Maltese government is being put on notice. As Kenneth Cassar points out, it can no longer "do as it pleases". From now on it will do as it is required to do by the Maltese Constitution, namely, serve the general good of all the Maltese people at all times. Whether it's PN or MLP nobody needs to care all that much, and God bless the EU. As to genuine hunters I wish to say this. I know you are good, law abiding men. You will go out of your way to help others. I am against you only because I love birds and the environment. I want birds to be alive and not dead or caged.
But following comments you have made on this issue, I can still appreciate your point. You may be able to re-group, and try a new approach. Be sure to select your membership very wisely, based on tested qualifications. Cast away the word "hobby" and focus on what is it that you really do, namely, harvesting to put food on the table. You are indigenous to the land, and it should be your sacred right to do just that, in properly designated and policed areas, within strict limits and respect of the law. With good lawyers on your side, well versed in international law, you may still be able to build your own case with the EU. You are naive to have expected the Maltese government to do it for you. At the same time, you also have been let down by an inept FKNK.
S Micallef (on 25/4/08)
I was not a big EU fan .. but i thank the Government for having us in the EU. Well done to EU Court for having issued the ban against Spring Hunting.

Thumbs up for this decision. We (the non hunters), together with our families and children can enjoy walks in the countryside as well as seeing these beautiful creatures venture on our island.
Sylvana Zarb Darmanin (on 25/4/08)
I quote:

"L-Unjoni Ewropeja accettat il-kacca f'Malta fir-Rebbiegha" (The EU has accepted that Spring Hunting and Trapping in Malta will continue)....Ministry of Home Affairs and the Environment (01.02.2003)

"Wara shubija, il-kaccaturi Maltin se jistghu jibqghu jmorru ghall-kacca fir-Rebbiegha" (Following EU membership the Maltese Hunters will continue to enjoy Spring Hunting).... Malta-EU Information Centre with the assistance of the Delegation from the European Commission in Malta (February 2003)

"The EU side acknowledged, in writing, that Malta would be using the derogation"
AND
"...outcome of the Referendum ... must surely have placed an onus on the EU and on the environmental lobby, both of whom were well aware of what was negotiated"
Both quotes from The Times - Ask your MEP (Dr. Simon Busuttil) under the
heading "Spring Hunting".

I also mention the Hon. Dr. Eddie Fenech Adami's letter in 2003 assuring the Maltese Hunters that Spring Hunting is guaranteed after EU Membership.

THE MALTESE LAW-ABIDING HUNTERS DEMAND AN EXPLANATION FROM THE ABOVE RESPECTABLE INDIVIDUALS. All other comments from persons who are enjoying inflicting mental violence on the thousands of Maltese Hunters are superfluous!

The crux of the matter is either that:-

1. The EU is a dictatorship, OR
2. The state has lied to its citizens.

Quoting again Dr. Simon Busuttil: "the EU referendum was at best, a 50-50 affair". Bearing in mind all the above, one would indeed question whether the majority still wish to form part of this EU!

As for Commissioner Stavros Dimas, I would have expected him to be more respectable towards an, unfortunately, EU citizen. I would have expected him to reply to my email which has been left unanswered for the past two and a half months!
Danielle Calenti (on 25/4/08)
Yes, hunting is a tradition that has been practised for generations. So was slavery. Did that make it ok? Of course not. It's a good thing we are finally getting our priorities straight.
Paul Micallef (on 25/4/08)
This is a memorable date. At last all birds can fly freely in our country and we humans can roam in the countryside with our families without the risk of getting shot or being insulted.

Hope that this case is closed once and for all.

Alfred Farrugia (on 25/4/08)
I cannot understand how efficient the EU Commission is when it comes to the hunting of a few birds in Malta, and how hopelessly useless it is when it comes to the occupation of a third of an EU member State next door to Greece, that is the island of Cyprus! It is remarkable that a few migratory birds are treated with urgency, but the EU has practically done nothing for Cyprus in 34 years. The plight of real people - such as those in Cyprus - is evidently not urgent for the EU Commission!

Does the Cabinet of Commissioner Stavros Dimas have any idea how many birds migrate in Spring from the south of the Mediterranean to the north? Does his Cabinet know what percentage of these numbers, and of the total world population of quail and turtle dove, is the amount bagged in Malta during the Spring hunting season? Have the EU Commission and the ECJ lost all sense of proportion, when pushed by the relevant NGOs? Can the ECJ decision be appealed?

It appears to me that the EU Commission and the ECJ have carried an injustice. The majority of the people in Malta might not be in favour of Spring hunting, but do minorities have absolutely no rights? I suggest that those in favour of Spring hunting send a complaint to the Commissioner at: stavros.dimas@ec.europa.eu
Nyal Xuereb (on 25/4/08)
This decision effectively confirms that the Maltese government took everyone for a ride: the hunters when it promised in writing that the hunting on turtle dove and quail will never be stopped; the environmentalists for repeatedly saying that a derogation has been agreed; and the general public for constantly stating that all was well and there was nothing wrong.
Daniel Bonello (on 25/4/08)
Shame on the EU and shame on the government! We have lost our sovereignty & dignity we once were so proud of!

May I remind you that if it wasn't for the thousands of hunters' votes during the EU referendum, Malta would not be a member of the EU of dictatorship!
Adrian Cardona (on 25/4/08)
and thank God we have to abide by EU regulations, because otherwise we would have remained being held to ransom by a small minority of rogue hunters, with successive governments never having the guts to curb all the excesses (don't blame the PN only for this, MLP always said they would abide with any EU decision). Hunters have only themselves and their association to blame, because they NEVER made any attempts to control illegal hunting....
@ H.Farrugia
just what exactly are you insinuating? What exactly are Maltese people made of? You mean that the small minority of uncontrollable hunters will go on another rampage if your so-called 'war' is lost? The vast majority of Maltese people welcome this decision and you have only yourselves to blame.
Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 25/4/08)
Obviously, no-one should resort to insulting others or anything like that but it is crystal clear that the hunting community only has itself to blame for failing to control the rogue element. The law is - and always was - what it is, whether it is EU law or national law. Anyone's failure to understand it, know it or abide by it is no-one's fault but his own.

@ D. Caruana and his promise to Gonzi that he (Caruana) "won't forget this". So?
mario pace (on 25/4/08)

AT last we have been waiting for this decision for quite some time now. Lets just hope that it will be banned forever and not this year only. By the way pls authorities do something about some of these people who are still shooting down birds everyday including this morning at various places in Siggiewi like at Tal providenza church area, Laferla cross and Tal hesri valley areas.
G.C.Forte (on 25/4/08)
Mr. Farrugia must speak for himself when saying "and you see what the Maltese are made of" although I am an animal lover, still I say that the hunters/trappers has been played off in the 2004 referendum,and by that time I showed sympathy for you,but trusting ( thousands of you) the same party in the last elections,I say shame on you,and like the English say "twice bitten twice shy", so stop grumble and get another passtime.
Malcolm Tortell (on 25/4/08)
Please! Hunting is not a "value". Neither does the fact that something has been practiced for generations mean it is a good thing. The two activities in Malta which are defended by the "argument from tradition" are hunting and fireworks. The fact is it's the only, albeit weak, argument, in favour of either. The vast majority of people are only inconvenienced or upset by the activities of a few. So for those hunters worried about Malta's loss of sovereignity, would you have the guts to request a referendum and see what the people of this country really want?
Kenneth Cassar (on 25/4/08)
Oh dear oh dear, H. Farrugia. Has it not occurred to you that the EU never really guaranteed spring hunting, and that the only people taking you for a ride were Simon Busuttil and the then Prime Minister Eddie Fenech Adami?

And has it not occurred to you that now that we are members of the EU, our government cannot do as it pleases, but would have to abide by EU regulations?

Antoine Grima (on 25/4/08)
1 DOWN 76 TO GO
l borg (on 25/4/08)
to all hunters
sorry but you have been defeated and learn to take NO for an answer
a big NO for spring hunting
however hunting of turtle dove is allowed all year round in argentina and infact they are pests
so next spring all maltese huntrs can go to argentina to hunt turtle doves
Tony Gatt (on 25/4/08)
Whilst I think the decision was a wise one, it was brought on by the rogue few who shot at anything that flew- even from vans and cars on the road.
Anyone who thought that Malta was now a free and independent country within the EU is in for a shock-the shipyard will be the next target.
Many people in the U.K. have come to regret joining the EU and if there were a referendum here the overwhelming majority would vote to get out.
Christopher Cachia (on 25/4/08)
Its not fair that people are sort of teasing hunters for the outcome of what happened. Hunters who observe the rules deserve better.
Kevin Borg Bezzina (on 25/4/08)
I'm pro-EU but I have to say that this was part of the negative side of the joining of the EU and I have to admit the hunters were clearly taken for a ride.

A big one, for the matter. The parliament hasn't even kicked off, which means the next PN government has more than 5 years in government before the election comes again, and this story of hunting will long long be forgotten by the election date in 5 years time.

So, yes, you have been taken for a ride. Don't you think its a little strange that the court decision was taken soon after the election was over in Malta a few weeks ago?

Hope you enjoyed the ride.
H. Farrugia (on 25/4/08)
Dear Commissioner Dimas, thank you for showing us that today, the Maltese Government counts nothing at all. Thank you for going back on the word given by the EU to the Maltese Nation in 2003, that hunting will be allowed in spring of every year. Thank you for showing that the then PM Eddie Fenech Adami and his cabinet were taken for a ride by the EU Commissioner Verhaugen.
Thanks for shaming us throughout the world. But the war has not as yet been won. We'll wait and see. Just try to tough our deeply ingrained values and you'll see what the Maltese people are made of.
J Pace (on 25/4/08)
Of course Malta abides by the ECJ's decision! Let's hope everyone understands that! Pity, it had to be the European Court to reach this decision since any government here could not do it before! Let's hope we see more beautiful pictures of living turtle doves and other migratory birds. Thank you BirdLife, ECJ and EU!
anthony cassar (on 25/4/08)
bye bye all the fanfare prior to the EU referendum. what the EU decides GONZIPN must obey !!!!! where are the special arrangements malta had made with the EU ?
D.Caruana (on 25/4/08)
Thank you Dr.Gonzi!!!!
I will never forget this. I promise you.

Oh, and I do keep my promises by the way.
Andrew Gatt (on 25/4/08)


WAS THIS ALL THE GOVERNMENT HAD TO SAY? AFTER LEAVING US WITHOUT COMMENT FOR WEEKS ON END? AFTER ALL THE PROMISES AND LETTERS ABOUT DEROGATIONS? IS THIS THE TRANSPARENCY? IS THIS THE "HADD M'HU GHAR-RIMI?"

I have respected and abided by the law all my hunting life. I have NEVER shot ANY protected bird. My bag is for the table. I have never hunted out of season. There are many, many others like me out there. At the stroke of a pen by some faceless European bureaucrat we have lost everything that generations of Maltese have practiced.

Who's to blame? Roll on Freedom of Information act.................






Poll

Do you agree that all public transport should be liberalised?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku