Blogs » Jes On Sport

  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

6 + 5 - Restoring a balance

155 FIFA members have voted in favour of a proposal aimed at limiting the number of foreign players who can start a football match to five by 2012. The fact that most of the members of the world football governing organisation favour this ruling (only five voted against) reflects the wish of the national federations to protect the development of the game at a national level.

A lot has been said about this ruling which is likely to herald a confrontation between FIFA + UEFA and the European Union.

In 1995, a rather unknown Belgian player, Jean-Marc Bosman, was the subject of a decision taken by the European Court of Justice. The Bosman ruling banned restrictions on players from EU member states within the national leagues and allowed such professional football players in the EU to move freely to another club at the end of their term of contract with their present team. This ruling also prohibited domestic football leagues in EU member states and also UEFA from imposing quotas on foreign players that discriminated against EU nationals.

This led to a situation where a lot of clubs within the EU field more than 7, 8 players who are foreigners. We also saw cases where players from outside the European Union got an EU passport following their blood linkage to some distant relative within the EU.

The most quoted example to prove the failure of the Bosman ruling is the situation in England. While English clubs having many foreign players are thriving in terms of awards and money, the national team has failed in international competitions. Recently published statistics have shown that only 170 of the 498 players who started matches in the top flight in 2007-08 were English - just 34.1% of the total. In 2006-07 191 (38%) of the starters were English. In 2001 the number of English players was 207.

The fact that some clubs can afford expensive foreign players has created a new league of teams and with it a new level of disparity among the clubs.

Given this situation the major football organisations had sought a way to reinstate a balance and protect the development of the game.

The 6+5 ruling is the result.

However, its implementation in the EU is going to be a tough task. The European Union has already stated that this rule infringes the freedom of movement of workers within the bloc. Therefore, a legal showdown looms.

I really hope that common sense and the ‘love for the game’ prevail over business interests in the discussions which will definitely take place in the coming weeks.

  • Google Bookmarks Del.icio.us Facebook Blogger YahooMyWeb Digg Reddit Stumbleupon
  • email article
  • print article
  • small text sizemedium text sizelarge text size
  • comment on this article

Comments

philip pace (on 7/6/08)
It is quite easy to blame that the lack of qualification of the English National team from Euro 2008 was due to the influx of foreign players. I do not think so.
The F.A. has to be honest enough to admit that they made a poor selection of the manager to replace Erickson. McLaren was a poor choice similar to 'Turnip' Graham Taylor (remember him? ). They were swayed by the ever present London based newspapers as these newspapers criticize everything under the sun. They hounded Erickson even in his private life.
Mclaren could not instill any teamwork, pride and passion that we see in other teams such as Italy, Germany, France, Holland, Portugal etc...
He had a very good bunch of players but he failed miserably to gel them together. I don't support the English national team as it is a spinless, boring, ineffective team to watch. I stopped supporting them since the 1970's when they kicked Sir Alf Ramsey out.
The fault lies simply in the elite few sittng at the F.A. as they 'enjoy' their job.

I am anxious to see the work of Fabio Cappello.
Bernard Pollacco (on 5/6/08)
if you see 3 transfers of english players going 2 the 'big 4' you will see that the teams are paying a range from 16m - 30m for 1 english players....with that kind of money you can buy around 5 foreign players who are better....

...... blatter you will ruin the beautiful game called football !!!!!!!!!
N. Gerada (on 5/6/08)
As you stated, "In 1995, a rather unknown Belgian player, Jean-Marc Bosman, was the subject of a decision taken by the European Court of Justice." In my opinion, from that date, soccer started in NATURAL DEATH and players started thinking on their pockets and not the shirt they wore.
Football is nowadays a business and players hold ransom their clubs for pay-rises and bonuses. Take the latest example of Ronaldo wanting to go from Manchester United (where he's an idol) to Real Madrid.
Jim Hamilton (on 2/6/08)
Recently published statistics have shown that only 170 of the 498 players who started matches in the top flight in 2007-08 were English.

I must admit to being a big fan of the English Premier League, and although it's good to see the foreign imports being drafted in, I do feel that some of the English lads are missing out from gaining valuable first team experience, experience which could eventually lead them on to represent their country. So for this reason I would be in favour of the 6 + 5.

But because of Britains unique position of having four countries England, Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland, all playing on their own international level, would this mean that any other player from the UK , playing in the English Premier League, would he be classified as a foreigner?





Andrew Borg-Cardona (on 2/6/08)
Typical crypto-socialism of the ineffectual classes ... we can't make the grade, so everyone else has to dumb down to our level ... the fact that I support Chelsea has nothing to do with my comment of course.....

All posts

Poll

Have the proposed power tariffs affected your use of electricity and water?

  • yes
  • no
  • don't know
  • don't care


View results

Fun Stuff


Play Sudoku