The proposed flyovers that Transport Malta is planning to build as substitutes or alternatives to the traffic islands that are sited at critical intersections in the hope of ensuring a smoother and, possibly, uninterrupted traffic flow, deserve to be very carefully studied and analysed prior to their implementation.

At first glance, these bulky structures, built way up above road level, would undoubtedly clash with and dwarf the adjoining panoramas typical of the Maltese landscape.

This landscape generally consists of relatively low height and sprawling building development on both sides of the street. It appears, therefore, highly desirable and necessary to explore and investigate other alternatives that would not compete with and harm the existing environment but would leave it completely untouched and unblemished.

A worthwhile and practical possibility that comes to mind as an alternative may be the excavation of tunnels at these critical points.

These would take and permit fast traffic movement on two separate lanes running in opposite directions.

Suitable arrangements in the design will naturally have to be included and worked out in view of traffic taking a side turn to merge gradually with vehicles that would be going in the same direction after crossing the intersection.

Judicious and economic utilisation of the excavated material should be found and employed on nearby major projects as landfill material on new roads possibly for sections that form part of the new highly-beneficial Malta circular road.

Any excess material could be used for dumping on and reclaiming of suitable sites nearby in order to create much-needed and essential land space either for housing or large commercial complexes.

If the tunnel proposition is found practicable, feasible and worthwhile it would eventually offer the great advantage of non-intrusion and preservation of the territorial integrity and character both in developed cores and in the open countryside. These areas will, in consequence, be retained to look exactly as at present by preserving the unique characteristic landscape to survive intact for the enjoyment of both locals and the thousands of tourists visiting our islands yearly.

The proposed arrangement should be proof and affirmation that our road professionals and the transport authorities are capable of solving severe and complex traffic problems correctly and efficiently in a rational and harmless way. Funding would obviously come from the monies previously earmarked and intended for the flyovers.

Flyovers are totally incompatible with and excessively heavy in appearance when viewed against the low height and delicate appearance of our buildings and structures.

They would also inevitably compete and clash seriously with the aesthetics especially with those of parish churches in the vicinity which give the impression of watching over and protecting the surrounding unpretentious buildings flanking the ever-present church square.