Britain’s Parliament approved air strikes against Islamic State (IS) insurgents in Iraq by a decisive margin yesterday, paving the way for the Royal Air Force to join US-led military action with immediate effect.
Six Cyprus-based Tornado GR4 fighter-bombers were on standby to take part in initial sorties after Prime Minister David Cameron recalled Parliament from recess to back military action following a formal request from the Iraqi government.
He told lawmakers before the vote not to expect a “shock and awe” air campaign, while his office said a small number of service people could be sent to Iraq within hours of the vote to guide air strikes and, possibly, to train Iraqi and Kurdish regional peshmerga forces battling IS militant forces.
The 524-43 vote means Britain will embark on its first military campaign since it conducted air strikes in 2011 on behalf of Libyan rebels who toppled Muammar Gaddafi, and join an international coalition led by the United States.
While Arab countries have quickly joined the bombing campaign, Washington’s traditional Western allies had been slow to answer the call from US President Barack Obama. France was the first European country to respond, on September 19, but since Monday, Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands and Denmark have announced they would dispatch warplanes.
Cameron was careful to secure cross-party support for strikes against IS before putting a motion before Parliament.
Left unchecked, we will face a terrorist caliphate on the shores of the Mediterranean
“Is there a threat to the British people? The answer is yes,” Cameron told Parliament before the vote, saying he thought action would need to last “years” to be effective.
“This is not a threat on the far side of the world. Left unchecked, we will face a terrorist caliphate on the shores of the Mediterranean and bordering a Nato member, with a declared and proven intention to attack our country and our people.”
Britain, a staunch US ally, was quick to join military action in Afghanistan and Iraq a decade ago. But a war-weary public and Parliament’s rejection last year of strikes on the Syrian government prompted Cameron to tread carefully this time.
Before yesterday, Britain had confined itself to delivering aid, carrying out surveillance, arming Kurdish forces who are fighting IS militants, and promising training in Iraq.
But the beheading of a British aid worker by an Islamic State militant with a British accent has driven home the danger the group poses to domestic security. The fate of another Briton being held, Alan Henning, has also stirred public opinion.
Cameron’s tactics dismayed some legislators in his Conservative Party who said they thought striking IS in Iraq was insufficient and wanted him to extend action to tackle militants in Syria too, something he said he wasn’t ready to do for now.
During a lively parliamentary debate, Richard Ottoway, the Conservative chairman of Parliament'’ Foreign Affairs Committee, said IS was ranging at will across an unguarded border between Iraq and Syria, meaning it had to be targeted in both countries.
“We will never end this conflict by turning back at the border,” Ottoway told Parliament.
Cameron explained he had not proposed air strikes in Syria because he realised there were concerns within the opposition Labour Party about such action.