Impractical system

Whoever briefed the Director of Information in answer to my letter (The Sunday Times, August 19) provides a clear case of why departmental systems go wrong. After a long time of negative input on a situation, initiative is sometimes finally taken. When...

Whoever briefed the Director of Information in answer to my letter (The Sunday Times, August 19) provides a clear case of why departmental systems go wrong.

After a long time of negative input on a situation, initiative is sometimes finally taken. When one keeps in mind the possible conflict of interest of the different parties involved, each pulling their intransigent way that, in itself, is a breakthrough. The safest thing after that is to deny anything which may tend to prove the new system wrong, as this upsets the effort and calls for more.

I have no doubt that the intention of the 'system' was good in the first place. However, in a situation where you have a doctor twiddling his or her thumbs and is not allowed to write a simple prescription which s/he is there to do, simply because one has no fixed appointment, while there is a long queue of patients waiting to see another doctor, does not strike me as being efficient or practical.

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.