This year the National Trust celebrates 50 years of Operation Neptune. Set up in 1965 as a reaction to the increasing development along the coastline, the launch was enthusiastically taken up and captured the imagination of people in Britain who were keen to save their beautiful heritage.
Money was quickly collected and the government chipped in with what was a considerable sum in those days. But the main driver was countless citizens who chipped in with their own money, or worked as volunteers. The objective was to purchase vast stretches of England’s 3,000 mile coastline – singling out the most beautiful and ecologically important stretches.
One can only think how enlightened those pioneers of this project were. Today over 750 miles of coastline has been purchased by, or gifted to, the National Trust. Thousands of acres of land are protected for this and future generations. Countless thousands enjoy beautiful unspoiled countryside; they can walk along the cliffs and beaches or among the woodlands. A huge tourist industry has also given economic life to the project, strangely enough, without the need for the construction of huge hotels.
The moral, spiritual, and even economic argument for conservation has been studiously ignored especially by our leaders
Wild flowers, forests, cliffs, beaches, woodlands, meadows and wild fauna all have their place in these parks. Wild deer, foxes, otters in the sea, seals and basking sharks safe from human encroachment in marine reserves, live in their natural environment.
The contrast with Malta could not be more different. Here countryside seems to have no value for our political leaders, save as cheap land ripe for development.
When Operation Neptune was being set up (indeed when Din l-Art Ħelwa was set up also in 1965), Malta still had large tracts of the coast in a pristine state. There was no Magħtab, no Buġibba, Xemxija Hill was undeveloped, and no Mistra Village. (Fuel storage tanks were there though). Mellieħa was largely still in its natural state. No huge terminal at Ċirkewwa, or large hotels at Marfa. No quarries and reverse osmosis plants at Għar Lapsi, no power stations, no creeping expansion in the villages and towns of the south to become one large mass of buildings (so poorly designed and so ugly alas), no now derelict hotels in front of the beautiful fort at San Tumas (touted as critical to the tourism industry at the time).
Of course development was needed but so much? Did it need to be so poorly designed? Today so little is left, but astonishingly we still place little value on our countryside or on our coastline. We are still led to believe that we need new developments which are critical to our development: White Rocks, Mistra, Smart City, huge hotels at Mellieħa, and now the new private university at Żonqor.
It is the developers who have the ear of politicians, while those who plead for conservation, for the protection of public land to be enjoyed by this and future generations, are cast aside.
The last tract of land on the northeast side, at Żonqor, is now up for grabs. We have already heard that we need it for hotels, and once this was shouted down we hear of a university. This is being touted as a sacred cow – education – when in fact it is just another business venture which of course may ultimately morph into another land grab by speculators.
The economic case for conservation is clearly not understood. The argument that tourists would come to see the beautiful countryside we have, the cliffs, beaches, valleys and xagħri, has not been understood. Nor the argument that we, as well as future generations, should be able to enjoy our heritage.
Where can one walk alongside the sea that is still in the countryside? From Żabbar to Ċirkewwa the land is almost totally developed and this last pocket is now up for grabs.
Yet the economic imperative of development in virgin land has failed. It has been used for Lidl supermarkets, quarries, schools, countless hotels, some of which lie derelict (Selmun and Jerma spring to mind).
How many times have we heard that it is critical for development and this is the only site? The main reason is because it is cheaper to develop ODZ than to find a site and develop within the development boundaries.
On the other hand, the moral, spiritual, and even economic argument for conservation has been studiously ignored especially by our leaders, and with those specifically tasked to protect our heritage – Mepa. Their unseeming haste to confirm the site as suitable just beggars belief.
It is way past time that they come on board. Times are changing and we are finally realising that what is left is not for sale – especially not to private developers. This land is ours, our heritage, our patrimony, to enjoy and pass on to future generations. My appeal to the political masters is to listen to us.
Prime Minister – there is a precedent. A golf course was once proposed in what is now Majjistral Park. After the outcry, the government listened and stopped the project.
We look to you now to listen and ensure that this valuable heritage is properly protected.
Martin Galea is former president and council member of Din l-Art Ħelwa.
Independent journalism costs money. Support Times of Malta for the price of a coffee.Support Us