Updated 3.54 pm with more details.

A British government minister admitted Tuesday that plans not to apply parts of the European Union divorce deal relating to Northern Ireland break international law, but only in "tightly defined circumstances".

Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis was speaking in parliament about legislation due to be published on Wednesday that will include attempts to "clarify" how last year's Withdrawal Agreement with Brussels is implemented.

Details of the proposals have caused concern among EU leaders, just as Brexit trade talks resumed, and calls for London to honour its international treaty commitments.

Lewis insisted Britain was "fully committed" to implementing the protocol on Northern Ireland, which would see the province continue to follow certain EU rules in order to keep its land border open with the Republic of Ireland.

But he said the new bill would create a "safety net" to ensure goods could move tariff-free within the United Kingdom -- including Northern Ireland -- and ensure that while EU state aid rules will apply in the province, they will not apply on the mainland -- England, Scotland and Wales.

A fellow Conservative MP, Bob Neill, questioned whether anything in the proposed UK Internal Market Bill might breach Britain's international legal obligations.

"I would say to my honourable friend that yes, this does break international law in a very specific and limited way," Lewis replied.

"We are taking the power to disapply the EU law concept of direct effect required by Article 4 in a certain, very tightly defined circumstances."

Article 4 of the Northern Ireland Protocol states how it will remain part of the UK's customs territory after Brexit.

Lewis said: "There are clear precedents for the UK and indeed other countries needing to consider their international obligations as circumstances change."

He cited a finance act in 2013 that contained provisions that "expressly disapply international tax treaties" where they allow abusive arrangements.

Lewis said Britain would seek to resolve any issues with the EU agreement through mutually agreed mechanisms.

"The clauses that will be in the bill tomorrow are specifically there so should that fail, to ensure we are able to deliver on our commitments to the people of Northern Ireland," he said. 

Britain left the 27-member EU on January 31 but remains bound by its rules until December 31 as it tries to thrash out the terms of a new trading relationship.

Both sides agree a deal must be struck by an EU summit in mid-October. But divisions remain on totemic issues such as state subsidies for industry and fishing rights.

Irish prime minister Micheal Martin said he was "concerned about the lateness" of London's proposed changes to the Northern Ireland Protocol, a key plank of the agreement.

"The Withdrawal Agreement is an international treaty and we expect the UK government to implement and to adhere to what was agreed," he told the Irish Examiner newspaper. 

"We trust them to do so or they would render the talks process null and void."

- Reopening old wounds -

Martin ruled out the return of a hard border between Ireland and Northern Ireland, a key part of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement that ended 30 years of violence over British rule in the province.

Northern Ireland will have Britain's only land border with the EU, and the Brexit protocol means the territory will continue to follow some of the bloc's rules to ensure the frontier remains open.

Johnson's spokesman insisted the government remained fully behind the Good Friday pact, arguing the planned legislative changes were a "safety net" to ensure a smooth passage for goods going to and from Northern Ireland after January 1.

But the EU, and anti-Brexit parties in Northern Ireland and Britain, fear Johnson is setting the stage to jettison the transition talks and go its own way, whatever the economic cost.

EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier vowed to interrogate his British counterpart, David Frost, about the plans when they meet from Tuesday afternoon.

"Everything that has been signed must be respected," the Frenchman said.

Heading into the meeting, which lasts until Thursday, Frost warned: "We need to see more realism from the EU about our status as an independent country".

Barnier last week underlined that full implementation of prior deals was "the only way to protect the Good Friday Agreement in all its dimensions". 

"And, of course, it is a precondition for us -– the EU and the UK -– to be able to forge a meaningful partnership built on trust."

- Shock in US -

The government is due to submit the changes to parliament on Wednesday, with warnings it will breach international law if it overrode the Withdrawal Agreement.

Tim Bale, deputy director of the UK In A Changing Europe research group, suggested the move could be a "negotiating ploy" to put pressure on Brussels.

The Attorney General's Office though, confirmed the head of the government's legal department had resigned over the changes, while US politicians also warned of repercussions. 

House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said last year that any British backsliding on Northern Ireland would mean no US-UK trade agreement.

Democratic congressman Brendan Boyle on Tuesday agreed, saying it would have "consequences well beyond trust dealings with the EU".

It would be "very difficult to enter into a trade negotiation with a party that would have just ripped up a very important agreement to us", he told BBC radio.

"They might just turn around and use the same tactic against you."

 

                

Sign up to our free newsletters

Get the best updates straight to your inbox:
Please select at least one mailing list.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By subscribing, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing.